/ 01
Natural language,
structured outcomes.
Describe what you want. Get explicit scope, non-goals, outcomes, and verification expectations.
OUTCOMEDefine what done looks like
NON-GOALSKeep scope from drifting
OPEN SOURCE · PREVIEW FIRST V1 PROTOTYPE
From intent to
actionable work.
Great software starts with a clear plan. Turn a rough development idea into structured work items with scope, acceptance criteria, and a reviewable preview.
010203
One idea. Clearer execution.
Real Codex + MCP smoke test verified.
INTENT → STRUCTURE
01 / THE IDEA
“Build a responsive portfolio with projects and contact links.”
↓
✓02 / SEALED PREVIEW
Responsive portfolio website
✓Desktop and mobile layouts
✓Keyboard accessible links
✓Clear verification steps
Conceptual previewREV 01
REVIEW BEFORE YOU BUILD ✦
BUILT FOR CLARITY, NOT AUTOPILOT01 / PLAN / REVIEW / DELIVER
01 THE PROBLEM
Ideas are easy.
Alignment is hard.
A request in a chat is not yet a specification. Delivery System gives the intent a durable shape before anyone commits to implementing it.
Natural language,
/ 02
Acceptance criteria
you can actually check.
Review work as verifiable outcomes, not an endless list of implementation steps.
✓ A clear deliverable✓ Keyboard navigation✓ Desktop + mobile
/ 03
A real preview.
No surprise writes.
Inspect the work item and copy the Markdown. The verified Lite flow does not create GitHub Issues.
PREVIEWReady to review
02 THE WORKFLOW
Three steps.
One clearer direction.
01
Describe the intent
State the problem, desired outcome, constraints, and what should stay out of scope.
02
Review the preview
Inspect structured work items, explicit acceptance criteria, and missing information.
03
Take the draft
Copy the Issue Markdown to your workflow. Repository writes are not part of this verified Lite path.
03 REAL OUTPUT
No magic tricks.
A captured result.
We ran a real Codex Skill against Delivery System’s local MCP server. One development request produced one sealed conceptual preview and one copyable GitHub Issue draft.
1Real MCP call
1Work item
0GitHub writes
MDresponsive-portfolio.md
# Responsive portfolio website
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Personal intro, projects, contact
- [ ] Desktop and mobile support
- [ ] Clear project link labels
- [ ] Visible keyboard focus
- [ ] No login, payment, or admin
## Verification
Review layout, accessibility, scope...
VERIFIED SAMPLE · CONCEPTUALREVISION 1
04 KNOW THE BOUNDARY
Trust starts with
honest boundaries.
Delivery System has a larger governed-application architecture in the source repository. This website presents only what the Lite preview workflow has actually demonstrated.
Architecture & current status✓
Verified in one Codex + local MCP setupRequest → sealed preview → copyable Issue Markdown.
✓
Human-readable, reviewable outputOutcome, scope, non-goals, criteria, verification.
–
Not yet integration-accepted for real GitHub ApplyThe full write-enabled path is not a released capability.
–
Not tool-level preview isolationThe tested default Host exposes additional MCP tools.
✳Make the work
BUILD WITH INTENTION
Make the work
make sense.
Start with a clearer plan. Keep the human in the loop.